TY - JOUR T1 - The Life Cycle Model, Replacement Rates, and Retirement Income Adequacy JF - The Journal of Retirement SP - 96 LP - 110 DO - 10.3905/jor.2017.4.3.096 VL - 4 IS - 3 AU - Andrew George Biggs Y1 - 2017/01/31 UR - https://pm-research.com/content/4/3/96.abstract N2 - The key insight of the life cycle model in economics is that a household’s consumption at any given time is determined not so much by its current income as by the total income available to the household over its lifetime. A replacement rate can be a useful tool in approximating the life cycle model’s predictions for how households prepare for retirement. The Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Actuary (SSA OACT) publishes two different calculations of retirement income replacement rates, each of which finds that Social Security benefits replace about 40% of a typical retiree’s pre-retirement earnings. Some interpret these figures as indicating that Social Security benefits are insufficiently generous and that U.S. households’ total retirement saving is inadequate. But SSA OACT’s two methods for calculating replacement rates both violate the life cycle model in a meaningful way. SSA OACT’s career-average earnings replacement rates, in which lifetime earnings are first indexed upward by the rate of economywide wage growth, exaggerates by roughly one-fifth the real value of earnings available to a household for consumption over its lifetime. This overstatement lowers a household’s measured ability to replace their pre-retirement earnings. SSA OACT’s final-earnings replacement rates effectively compare Social Security retirement benefits to pre-retirement earnings only in the years in which the individual worked, ignoring the life cycle model’s prediction that household consumption is a function of long-term average earnings, including years in which a household member was not employed. A replacement-rate calculation more consistent with the life cycle model would compare retirement income to an average of real earnings calculated over a significant number of years. Such an approach would find substantially higher replacement rates for the typical retiree. It is important both for Social Security policy and the analysis of overall retirement savings adequacy that replacement-rate calculations build on the insights of the life cycle model that guides most economic analysis of retirement saving.TOPICS: Social security, legal/regulatory/public policy, retirement ER -